I write better when I smoke. Don’t ask me to reduce it to a science.

Land Reform

Seriously. What is the argument for land reform?

The Inquirer’s Juan Mercado published a summary of angry reactions from – apparently – land holders and those comments beg the question: shouldn’t land reform, as our law defines it and puts it into practice, be revisited at least?


Filed under: society, ,

4 Responses

  1. brianbro says:

    They create a diversion by going after smaller lands, sparing the bigger ones. Middle class resents it and go over the side of the wealthy land-grabbers.

  2. cvj says:

    As shown by our neighbors’ examples, addressing land inequality is part of Step 0, i.e. the foundation for subsequent efforts at industrialization. If you’re wondering why no matter how we seem to imitate the policies of the more successful countries with less successful results, it is in a large part because we skipped completing this step, so land inequality remains. Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam, Japan, China, you name it, whether Communist or capitalist, economically successful countries had in their early history, a step where they addressed land inequality.

  3. UP n grad says:

    I still recall where Teddy Locsin and Satur voted against the last CARP-promulgation because the government-sponsored version proposed to give ownership of the land to the landless farmers (while Locsin/Satur wanted State to own the land and for the farmers to be eternal tenants).

  4. UP n grad says:

    By the way, in the 21st century, retail, not farming, may be a more efficient way out of poverty. The profit-margins are higher, money-velocity flows faster and the footprint, capital and education-requirements are lower.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

RSS Short Puffs

  • Re-election 31 December 2008
    Maceda sez Erap consulted Narvasa and others, and they told him that the 1987 Consti prohibits only the INCUMBENT prez from re-election. Former prezzies, by their definition, face no such prohibition. But in the same breath, Maceda also sez that they know an Erap candidacy will be the subject of a disqual case – but […]
  • Escalation 30 December 2008
    I still think the Pangandaman’s shouldn’t have retaliated even if dela Paz threw the first punch. But is anyone really surprised at the escalation in the story-telling on both sides? BTW, I think we can dispense with the age angle nao.
  • Etiquette 29 December 2008
    Unless you’re spoiling for a fight, assume that the writer has some basis for what she writes. Don’t make like a lawyer and ask retarded questions in an attempt to lay the foundation for whatever point you’re trying to make.
  • Anne 28 December 2008
    Anne Curtis won best actress? Against the likes of Marian Rivera and Diana Zubiri? So what?
  • Baler 28 December 2008
    Watching Baler tomorrow. Will it be worth it?

Locations of visitors to this page

Archived Maps:
Politics & Government - Top Blogs Philippines

My site is worth $119.
How much is yours worth?

%d bloggers like this: