I write better when I smoke. Don’t ask me to reduce it to a science.

The politics of outrage

Panfilo Lacson is just taking a page out of McCain’s playbook. That’s all it is, really. He’s capitalizing on outrage because outrage lands him on the front page of newspapers; it gives him the kind of free air-time that Manny Villar needs to buy; and it hood-winks the Filipino voter into thinking he is some sort of moral crusader out on a mission to clean government up.

But not only that. He is also capitalizing on the outrageous. I mean, what could be more outrageous than two appropriations for what seems to be the same project? In a country already convinced that all government officials are out to steal money, the implication is plenty obvious. Lacson just connected the dots. Too bad, tho’ that he didn’t wait until Lehman folded.

Imagine that. On the same morning that our headlines are blaring the news about the demise of Lehman and the inevitable repercussions on our already limping economy, Lacson reveals the double-appropriation. OMFG! The double appropriation becomes infinitely more sinister as it is juxtaposed against the country’s dire financial straits!

Never mind that he had every opportunity to catch this double-appropriation before the budget was passed. It’s kinda like knowingly leaving the window open and then complaining that someone forgot to close it. Lucky for Lacson, that sort of intellectual dishonesty isn’t nearly as outrageous as the idea of a road being built.

Oh well. Lacson got what he wanted anyway, didn’t he?


Filed under: 2010 watch, politics, , , , , , ,

2 Responses

  1. Bencard says:

    why the comparison of lacson with mccain? when and how did the latter ever capitalize on “outrage”?
    if you are referring to obama’s association with the likes of ayers, dorn, farrakhian, resko and, of course, revs. wright & pleger, this outrage has a life of itself and mccain has nothing to do with that.

    i think mccain has maintained and is maintaining a high level campaign. if at times he is forced to be negative, it is in self–defense.

    on the other hand, i don’t think lacson can ever become president simply by pointing out that everyone else is evil. he would be judged on his own quality, integrity, competence or the lack of them.

  2. rom says:

    bencard: uncle, McCain’s campaign made a big deal about the supposed mistreatment of Palin, painting the Obama campaign as being outrageously sexist. After that, McCain lambasted Obama for allegedly supporting moves to teach kindergarten kids about sex and for supposedly calling Palin a pig with lipstick. Both attacks are clearly calculated to cause outrage among the voters – outrage against Obama – because an objective look at both attacks show obvious misrepresentation.

    The sex-ed Obama was supporting was for age-appropriate instruction, meaning that kindergarten kids would obviously not be taught about sex in its salacious sense. And as for calling Palin a pig with lipstick, Obama wasn’t even talking about Palin (and her lipstick joke) when he said those words.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

RSS Short Puffs

  • Re-election 31 December 2008
    Maceda sez Erap consulted Narvasa and others, and they told him that the 1987 Consti prohibits only the INCUMBENT prez from re-election. Former prezzies, by their definition, face no such prohibition. But in the same breath, Maceda also sez that they know an Erap candidacy will be the subject of a disqual case – but […]
  • Escalation 30 December 2008
    I still think the Pangandaman’s shouldn’t have retaliated even if dela Paz threw the first punch. But is anyone really surprised at the escalation in the story-telling on both sides? BTW, I think we can dispense with the age angle nao.
  • Etiquette 29 December 2008
    Unless you’re spoiling for a fight, assume that the writer has some basis for what she writes. Don’t make like a lawyer and ask retarded questions in an attempt to lay the foundation for whatever point you’re trying to make.
  • Anne 28 December 2008
    Anne Curtis won best actress? Against the likes of Marian Rivera and Diana Zubiri? So what?
  • Baler 28 December 2008
    Watching Baler tomorrow. Will it be worth it?

Locations of visitors to this page

Archived Maps:
Politics & Government - Top Blogs Philippines

My site is worth $119.
How much is yours worth?

%d bloggers like this: