I write better when I smoke. Don’t ask me to reduce it to a science.


Just downloaded Google’s Chrome and been browsing with it for most of the day.

The first thing you notice about this new browser is how wide it makes the screen look. That’s because there’s no titlebar, just one toolbar, and the tabs are located at the very top of the screen. If you’re running with a maximized window, it can actually get tricky to find the tabs because they’re all squished up against the top of your screen. Then there’s the ‘omnibar’ – Chrome’s address-slash-search bar. All this streamlining has led to a lot more screen real estate, which (as expected) Google doesn’t clutter up with graphics.

The defAULT new tab screen (blank in all other browsers) features thumbnails of your Most Visited Sites, a search bar, and a listing of all your recent bookmarks. Really neat, except if you browse from work and are a regular visitor to porn sites. LOL!

Performance wise, Google says that Chrome makes browsing faster by having each operation run on  an independent thread, rather than stringing each operation on a single thread, like a string of pearls. So, if a big download on, say IE, makes other web operations run slower, the same download on Chrome doesn’t. The secret lies in the fact that on other browsers, big operations tend to eat up computing power, starving the other operations on the same single thread. Chrome, however, gives each operation its own thread, so they don’t compete. 

That’s how I understand it, anyway. Techies will love (or maybe cringe) the hyper simplified illustrated explanation Google provides.

Mesself, I haven’t really felt any significant difference in performance, but maybe that’s because I don’t use web-based apps too much. But since the future is looking more and more like it’s gonna be about web-based apps, I imagine Chrome’s multi-thread style will make on-line computing a more viable alternative to desktop computing.

Looks wise, like I already said, Chrome actually looks pretty bare. ANd it doesn’t support a whole lot of extensions and add-ons like Firefox. As a Firefox user, this was a big deal for me. One of the first things I tried to do was to tweak themes, but as I found out, that can be pretty cmplicated for Chrome. Still, I noticed that there’s already a number of downloadable themes for Chrome – but nothing that really goes beyond changing background colors. Icons remain mostly the same and so on, so there’s really not much point. 

But themes and such don’t really matter all that much, do they? Functionality rules, and in that, Chrome is holding its own so far. Which, for me, shouldn’t be considered as saying a lot. Hell, I’m a casual browser, bitches. As long as this thing isn’t a step down from Firefox, I’m a happy camper. LOL!


Filed under: blogging, intartubes, tech, , , , ,

5 Responses

  1. beearl says:

    I had been thinking about checking it out, but I don’t really have a problem with Firefox (or IE for that matter), so it just seems like another web browser for me.

    Until I hear a must-have, glowing review…I’ll pass.

  2. rom says:

    beearl: welcome to the smoking room! I know what you mean about Chrome not being spectacular enough. BTW, how goes the hunt for the origins of our fav’rit expression? 😀

  3. beearl says:

    It does not go well.

    Apparently they are going to have to wait until each of us passes away and then do a bunch of tests on our brains to figure out where we both came up with this. 🙂

    I think your comic-book guess may be the most likely. I haven’t read much Talbot, but Grant Morrison is ringing a bell for me.

  4. DJB Rizalist says:

    yeah, i think it’s a winner. nice clean look. lacks some stuff but i think that should evolve.

  5. rom says:

    DJB: welcome to the smoking room! Yeah, I’m really liking it now too!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

RSS Short Puffs

  • Re-election 31 December 2008
    Maceda sez Erap consulted Narvasa and others, and they told him that the 1987 Consti prohibits only the INCUMBENT prez from re-election. Former prezzies, by their definition, face no such prohibition. But in the same breath, Maceda also sez that they know an Erap candidacy will be the subject of a disqual case – but […]
  • Escalation 30 December 2008
    I still think the Pangandaman’s shouldn’t have retaliated even if dela Paz threw the first punch. But is anyone really surprised at the escalation in the story-telling on both sides? BTW, I think we can dispense with the age angle nao.
  • Etiquette 29 December 2008
    Unless you’re spoiling for a fight, assume that the writer has some basis for what she writes. Don’t make like a lawyer and ask retarded questions in an attempt to lay the foundation for whatever point you’re trying to make.
  • Anne 28 December 2008
    Anne Curtis won best actress? Against the likes of Marian Rivera and Diana Zubiri? So what?
  • Baler 28 December 2008
    Watching Baler tomorrow. Will it be worth it?

Locations of visitors to this page

Archived Maps:
Politics & Government - Top Blogs Philippines

My site is worth $119.
How much is yours worth?

%d bloggers like this: