I write better when I smoke. Don’t ask me to reduce it to a science.


In the aftermath of the murders in Laguna, the gun-less society folks have started coming out of the woodwork. But honestly, what good will it do?

This morning, a guy named Nandy(?) Pacheco was ranting and raving on radio (hey! awesome alliteration!) about how his group – something called the “Gunless Society” – has been advocating a total gun ban. When he explained a little further, it turned out that it was nothing of the kind. They will still allow private gun ownership, but they won’t allow the issuance of permits to carry or PTCs.

Basically, you need two licences if you have a gun: a licence to possess the firearm, and a permit to carry it around with you. If you don’t have the first one, your possession would be illegal. If you have the first but not the second, your possession would be legal but the gun will have to stay wherever you put it first – such as your home or your office. Having both licences means your possession is legal and you can bring the gun around with you wherever you go.

So, the Gunless Society’s solution will actually still allow you to have guns, only you can’t carry it with you. According to them, that’ll cut down on gun related crimes. And that’s where it gets funny. By definition, a law (or a policy) that prohibits either the private ownership or transportation of weapons will be respected only by people who obey the law anyway. And these are the same people who don’t do things like massacre people or go Columbine on your ass for no reason at all. Criminals – those guys who don’t obey the law – will hardly feel the passage of gun control laws for the simple reason that they don’t bother with niceties like that.

Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws.

And so, the net effect of the Gunless Society’s proposition – or its eponymous ultimate goal – will be to deprive law-abiding citizens of their guns, while leaving law-breakers armed to the teeth. Seriously, I don’t see how that is going to make life safer for the rest of us when the threat from guns doesn’t come from accidents or such things, but from people who have made the conscious and deliberate decision to point, shoot, and kill. Guns, as they say, don’t kill people. People kill people.


The most commonly repeated argument against the “guns for defense” argument is that it’s pretty pointless when all it takes is one bullet to snuff you out. True enough. But just like seatbelts won’t do a damned thing for you if you drive your car off a cliff but will transform certain fatal crashes into survivable accidents (like if you wrapped your car around a tree or something), having a gun will help ensure your continued survival if you’re lucky enough to survive the initial blow. That is a very important thing.


My heart goes out to those who were killed in that bank robbery; and my heart bleeds for the Balisong and Pili families who were killed in Laguna just last night – but gun control won’t help them out any more than it’ll help us out. I wish people would stop using them as posthumous poster-children for a naive and wistful advocacy like a gunless society. Guns are like the demons in Pandora’s box. Once we’ve learned how to use them and profit by them, we can’t simply wish them away.

I wish I could present a solution – a better alternative to just praying for justice and agitating for gun control – but I’ve got nothing. And even if I had any proposal, I wouldn’t want to go into it just yet. Y’see, right now, I’m dancing too close to the edge of my principles and I might end up endorsing a course of action that I would – under less clouded circumstances – never even consider.


Filed under: crime, law and order, society, , ,

8 Responses

  1. Crime Wave says:

    […] to home ground, Smoke understands the futility of gun control laws that only law-abiding citizens will obey in the first […]

  2. pinoyapache says:

    just the same it is still a safer society if few people bring guns on the streets, with or without criminals…

  3. sally resuello says:

    my family had been threatened at gunpoint by our neighbor while we were celebrating the coming of the new year at 12:15 a.m. on 01 jan 2009, while we were just outside our house, on the street. we live in a tahanan village paranaque, an area which is considered by many a ‘safe and secured’ place to live.
    we are now in doubt about this and being haunted by a deep fear from this neighbor. i have actually read senator pimentel’s senate bill 278 about gun control and mostly i agree and will support this bill.
    would you mind giving me a feedback on this bill and your own comment?
    i would be forever grateful. thank you for your kind reply.

  4. sally resuello says:

    With regards to my letter dated 03 Jan 2009; here’s an update:
    The said neighbour is, ROBERT RAZO TY of #5 Santan St. Tahanan Village, Paranaque.
    Joint Resolution dated 27 April 2009 from the Honorable Prosecutor’s Office of Paranaque states:
    “Wherefore, premises considered,the undersigned respectfully recommends,the attached information for light threats, involving a minor, be filed before the Regional Trial Court and two (2) counts of Slight Physical Injuries be filed before Municipal Trial Court, all against respondent ROBERT RAZO TY.”
    TY now stands accused in Criminal Case No. 09-0557 with RTC and Criminal Case No.09-0662-63 with MTC.
    With the help of God and your support, we believe justice will be served.

  5. rom says:

    Hi sally. I’ve been away. sorta.

    I’m sorry you were threatened at gunpoint by this bastard neighbor of yours.

    As for the Bill, it only penalizes the absence of a permit to carry, while limiting the issuance of that permit. But like I said, not having a permit to carry doesn’t prevent a person from having a gun. Especially at home.

    Now if it were up to me, i’d draft a law that’d make the use of firearms an aggravating circumstance so that, in your case for example, the case will be for GRAVE rather than light threats.

  6. RD says:

    Hi Sally,

    I hope you get this guy.

    By the way, did you use to live in Moonwalk around the 70’s?

  7. Rod says:

    Hi Sally,

    I hope you get that guy.

    Anyway, did you use to live in Moonwalk some 30 years ago?

  8. Ted says:

    HI Sally Resuello,

    I’m from Tahanan Village and the person you have mentioned is running for councilor at BF. If you google his name he also has criminal records at Utah USA, harassment cases and complaints from the Tahanan office regarding gun pointing. This guy is a power trip and trigger happy. His poster campaign looks like he is kind with all smiles, violated the COMELEC campaign period and we hope the people will not vote him by viewing his posters.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

RSS Short Puffs

  • Re-election 31 December 2008
    Maceda sez Erap consulted Narvasa and others, and they told him that the 1987 Consti prohibits only the INCUMBENT prez from re-election. Former prezzies, by their definition, face no such prohibition. But in the same breath, Maceda also sez that they know an Erap candidacy will be the subject of a disqual case – but […]
  • Escalation 30 December 2008
    I still think the Pangandaman’s shouldn’t have retaliated even if dela Paz threw the first punch. But is anyone really surprised at the escalation in the story-telling on both sides? BTW, I think we can dispense with the age angle nao.
  • Etiquette 29 December 2008
    Unless you’re spoiling for a fight, assume that the writer has some basis for what she writes. Don’t make like a lawyer and ask retarded questions in an attempt to lay the foundation for whatever point you’re trying to make.
  • Anne 28 December 2008
    Anne Curtis won best actress? Against the likes of Marian Rivera and Diana Zubiri? So what?
  • Baler 28 December 2008
    Watching Baler tomorrow. Will it be worth it?

Locations of visitors to this page

Archived Maps:
Politics & Government - Top Blogs Philippines

My site is worth $119.
How much is yours worth?

%d bloggers like this: