I write better when I smoke. Don’t ask me to reduce it to a science.

Yellow baiting and green oil

There’s an apocryphal story about how Senator Juan Flavier was once passing out photos asking people to caption them. One after the other, the pictures were captioned, until the very last one. That picture was of Frank Drilon. People were at a loss. They couldn’t (or probably didn’t want to) find anything funny to say so they passed it back to Flavier. He looks at it, shrugs, and with a cheese-eater grin goes “Mila’s lechon.”


This is the Wikipedia‘s definition of “red-baiting:”

Red-baiting is the act of accusing someone, or some group, of being communist, socialist or, in a broader sense, of being significantly more leftist at their core than they may appear at the outset. The term is used mainly with the intention of discrediting the individual’s or organization’s political views as dishonest and/or haphazard. The implication in red-baiting is usually that the target represents an ill-intentioned external force which has no proper place in a given political party, coalition, or union.

New word: Yellow-baiting – the act of accusing someone, or some group, of being significantly more treasonous at their core than they may appear at the outset. The term is used mainly with the intention of discrediting the individual’s acts as dishonest or treacherous to national interests because they involve official transactions with the People’s Republic of China. The implication in yellow-baiting is usually that the target represents an external force which, through the grant of loans to the country, has the intention of subverting our sovereignty.


It’s funny how the same people who disparage Merceditas Gutierrez’s competence (and credibility) and sniggeringly call her Ombudsgirl (Gabriela ought to be offended. I am, and I’m not even a feminist) are the same people who are now trying to demonize the Joint Marine Seismic Undertaking (JMSU) by using an alleged quote from her, as though she were some prophet, about how she was worried that the agreement might be unconstitutional.

Anyway, these same people also say that after Gutierrez voiced her apprehension, the undertaking was re-worded to be compliant with the Constitution. Does the name matter so much? A rose by any other name would smell as sweet. Or should it be “shit stinks whatever you call it?” In either case, I’ve seen some I’ve read some decided cases where the issue hinged on nomenclature. So, yeah, it could be that calling it a seismic undertaking instead of an exploration might have just been a cosmetic change meant to cover up the essential unconstitutionality of the deal.

Still, assuming that oil exploration is indeed the underlying motivation for the JMSU – this reminds of the whole mining issue. Near as I can figure it, it’s the small miners – with the support of big environmental groups and even bigger communist organizations – that want large-scale mining banned. Ironically, small mining operations are actually more harmful for the environment, even though they are so dreadfully inefficient at getting the mineral wealth out of the ground. The net result is that while the dead-end bucolic lifestyle is perpetuated, the wealth lies dormant underground instead of being drawn out (responsibly ans sustainably by large mining entities) and made to benefit the country.

A parallel can be drawn with the JMSU where, it would appear, that some people are willing to forego the benefits of a joint exploration if only to ease their apprehensions of treachery. Of course they will say that all they want is full disclosure, but that’s bullshit. If all they really want is full disclosure, then there is no need for the full-steam-ahead effort to discredit the JMSU and portray it as treason before the all the details are really known. By doing it the way they are doing it now, they only guarantee that no matter how sound the JMSU is, it will never be truly accepted by the people who know only the unsubstantiated, pompous drivel being poured into their ears now. And so like the mining industry, it seems we might be headed for a future where both our claim on the Spratlys and the supposed ASEAN consensus remain whole but where the wealth under the sea (if indeed there is wealth) remains under the sea, simply because we had neither the imagination nor the audacity to do something about it.


Yay, school! According to Ducky Paredes,  an Ateneo-UP-de la Salle consortium is spearheading research into algal oil. That’s oil from algae – yep. Oil from the green scum in your broke-ass aquarium. The consortium is experimenting on using LED lights on algae to see which colors (or combinations of colors) make the algae grow faster and produce more oil. The consortium wants to present its work at the SEE Forum –  an “Asia-Pacific Academic Network for sustainable energy and environment (SEE) that brings forward the dialogue on global issues of common concern.” Nerds rock!


Filed under: humor, international, New Word, politics, science, , , ,

4 Responses

  1. BrianB says:

    So we need a magnifying lens to see the virtue of this supposed seismic whatchamacallit.

    Though I am not arguing finding oil and digging it up will be beneficial to our country, I doubt if that is merely China’s motivation. This is a country who could simply ban vehicles when oil.

    If they can find exploration partners besides China, this wouldn’t even be debated. But there are higher priorities besides oil, and fear of losing our territories, no matter how uninformed is valid I think. ROM, some people, especially technically gifted like living on the edge but that does not mean they should bring the entire country to live on that edge with them. This is why I don’t like the stock market, though I used to play the PSE some years ago.

    I mean, why even deal with China when the Spratlys is involved?

  2. rom says:

    brianb:so maybe we should partner with some western country – because i’m guessing we can’t partner with other SEA countries since we’re all claimants? seriously. everyone is talking about how this weakens our claim. but no one is saying how this will strengthen China’s claim. it’s not like they can go to the UN and say, ‘look, we have this JMSU, so this area has been ceded to us by the Philippines.’ Diplomacy may be a game of smoke and mirrors, but it does make simply giving away real estate very very difficult to do.

  3. BrianB says:

    It’s not simply losing territory, it can cause conflict, conflict that I might be conscripted to join as a young, unmarried man. This is China, a China who thinks it owns Taiwan as well as the South China Sea. Paranoia is the right reaction in this case. Inviting the Chinese to cooperation on anything involving Kalayaan is for the bold (read: the nationally apathetic).

    You might be under the impression that the UN and hoity toity diplomacy will be a deterrent to China. I doubt it. You may not remeber it during Ramos’ time but they tried sneaking in once into an island we owned. We Filipinos woke up to one of the islands already with a Chinese structure on it. It happened overnight, I believe.

  4. shiro says:

    hmmm… i’m a bit familiar with the algae oil project. the light that promotes growth is red. heheheh 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

RSS Short Puffs

  • Re-election 31 December 2008
    Maceda sez Erap consulted Narvasa and others, and they told him that the 1987 Consti prohibits only the INCUMBENT prez from re-election. Former prezzies, by their definition, face no such prohibition. But in the same breath, Maceda also sez that they know an Erap candidacy will be the subject of a disqual case – but […]
  • Escalation 30 December 2008
    I still think the Pangandaman’s shouldn’t have retaliated even if dela Paz threw the first punch. But is anyone really surprised at the escalation in the story-telling on both sides? BTW, I think we can dispense with the age angle nao.
  • Etiquette 29 December 2008
    Unless you’re spoiling for a fight, assume that the writer has some basis for what she writes. Don’t make like a lawyer and ask retarded questions in an attempt to lay the foundation for whatever point you’re trying to make.
  • Anne 28 December 2008
    Anne Curtis won best actress? Against the likes of Marian Rivera and Diana Zubiri? So what?
  • Baler 28 December 2008
    Watching Baler tomorrow. Will it be worth it?

Locations of visitors to this page

Archived Maps:
Politics & Government - Top Blogs Philippines

My site is worth $119.
How much is yours worth?

%d bloggers like this: